The Righteous Mind : Why Good People Are Divided By Politics And Religion

1347 Words Dec 15th, 2015 null Page
Political actions are arguably motivated by moral beliefs of both the citizens of a state and their elected leaders. Since religion inherently contains a moral and ethical standard for participants to abide by, the use of religious statements by presidents can effectively provide insight into their moral realm. A president that frequently utilizes subtle religious rhetoric is also providing his listeners with an understanding of his moral beliefs. As Jonathan Haidt illustrates in his book The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion, people’s decisions and actions are driven by their emotional and moral beliefs subconsciously, and the logic and reasoning people provide to defend these decisions and actions are developed post hoc (Haidt, 2012). This bit of psychological insight on why individuals behave the way they do can be directly applied to the role of a president and their political actions and decisions in order to gain understanding of their fundamental moral philosophy.
Haidt appropriately uses the term “elephant” to describe an individual’s emotional and moral belief system that dominates their actions and decisions. Sitting atop this elephant is the “rider”, which Haidt considers to be an individual’s logic and reasoning. Metaphorically, the elephant cannot be controlled by the rider. The rider sits passively on top of the beast, observing its actions and behavior and contemplates of ways to logically defend the elephant’s decisions…

Related Documents

Die meist beobachteten | Hugh Dillon | New User Guide