The Is No Reason For A Mind Independent Reality? Essay

1051 Words Feb 24th, 2016 null Page
Russell argues that, while he cannot prove solipsism false, there is no reason to suppose that it is true. Why does Russell think there is no reason to suppose solipsism is true? Is Russell correct in his assertion that it is simpler to believe in a mind-independent reality? Is this assertion enough to solve the problem of the external world? Why or why not? Explain.
Solipsism is the belief that the self is all that exists (Bailey, 338). Bertrand Russell set upon proving whether or not to believe it was true. He concluded that it is incorrect to entertain the idea that solipsism is true. Due to the principle of simplicity, Russell believes that the falsity of solipsism is necessary. He says “Since this belief does not lead to any difficulties, but on the contrary tends to simplify and systematize our account of our experiences, there seems no good reason for rejecting it.” (Russell, 124). Believing that solipsism is false makes it simpler to exist in reality and allows us to focus on how to survive. He also argues that a mind-independent reality exists even though it is impossible to know what the materials which populate it are like (Russell, 128). He is right in believing this because arguing against a mind-independent reality without proper evidence to accept a different belief is ineffective. In the end Russell states that simplicity is sufficient to solve the problem of the external world. He embraces skepticism and abandons the search for certainty (Russell, 125).…

Related Documents

Yamla Pagla Deewana Phir Se | Daniel Radcliffe | Mobile Suit Gundam Thunderbolt English Subbed