Effective Participation Within Connective Action Networks Essay

1694 Words Apr 12th, 2016 7 Pages
According to Bennett and Segerberg, organizationally enabled networks tend to receive more positive media attention because they have specific action frames that can be discussed by the media and tend to be more organized in terms of action and cohesion. In contrast, while crowd-enabled networks that include a large number of members may have the ability to affect the public to a similar degree, perceived levels of commitment and engagement tend to fluctuate, resulting in a media coverage that may be less favorable. However, these variable levels of engagement and participation are consistent with the previous discussion of personalized participation within connective action networks. It is important to note that collective and connective action networks do not tend to appear as disparate phenomena that exist completely outside the scope of one another. Instead, they may be inhabit the same protest space in various forms, potentially combining to form a unique dynamic within the space. This has the potential to either increase the effectiveness of a particular action or result in conflict within the protest space that can cause dissolution, lack of momentum, or an inability to increase the scope of the action. In particular, logics may clash when networks attempt to change in response to shifting conditions, circumstances, goals, and participation, which may lead to more complexly structured networks or shifts within the protest space itself that occur as a response to the…

Related Documents

300M /1000M LCD Collier de dressage Electrique Chock Télécommande Anti-aboiement | Rampage: Devastación (2018) 4K UHD Audio Dual... | Amazon Echo