Drone Strikes Foster New Enemies Essay

865 Words Apr 17th, 2016 4 Pages
Drone Strikes Foster New Enemies Since September 11, 2001, The United States has been using drones strikes against the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and other terrorist groups. The Constitution requires that the government must go through a due process before making the decision of killing someone. Drone strikes are usually based on doubtful information, which ends up taking the life of innocent civilians. Civilians living in the Middle East are being killed because of mistaken identity, or for just being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Drone strikes are wrong because they kill innocent civilians violate due process, and result in blowback. The case in favor of Drone Strikes
After the attack of September 11, the U.S. began using drones to help fight the war against terrorism. The use of the drone has helped the defense of the country to a certain extent. People claim drone strikes are a useful weapon in war because they kill the enemy without putting soldiers in danger. In the article “At Issue: Targeted Strikes” article notes, “Proponents credit drone strikes with the killing of many of top commanders of the Taliban, Al Qaeda, and argue that they are a legal form of self defense.” The benefit of this is that U.S. soldiers do not have to be in unfriendly locations exposing themselves to danger. “One advantage of drones is that they can be deployed for long periods of time over hostile…

Related Documents

Sam Trammell | House of Manson (2014) | Jeff Denton